﻿<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Undefined array key "p" in <b>/home/asialyst/www/releases/20250606081313/fr/wp-content/themes/asialyst_v2.3/shortcodes/article-category.php</b> on line <b>9</b><br />
{"id":7409,"date":"2015-12-07T13:25:16","date_gmt":"2015-12-07T12:25:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/brouillon-regard-4\/"},"modified":"2015-12-10T15:37:38","modified_gmt":"2015-12-10T14:37:38","slug":"arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/","title":{"rendered":"Arbitrage en Chine : imbroglio et clarifications"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"container\">\n\t<meta itemprop=\"keywords\" content=\"Economie\" \/>\n\t<a href=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/economie\/\" class=\"category category-37\">Economie<\/a><br \/>\n\t<time datetime=\"2015-12-07T13:25:16Z\" itemprop=\"datePublished\">\n\t\tPubli\u00e9 07 D\u00e9cembre 2015<br \/>\n\t\tMis \u00e0 jour 10 D\u00e9cembre 2015\t<\/time>\n\t<meta itemprop=\"dateModified\" content=\"2015-12-10T15:37:38Z\" \/>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"container\">\n<div class=\"surtitre\" itemprop=\"headline\">EXPERT - Droit des affaires en Asie<\/div><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<h1 itemprop=\"name\">Arbitrage en Chine : imbroglio et clarifications<\/h1>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"container\">\n  <div class=\"authors\">\n    <ul>\n    \t        <li class=\"author\" itemprop=\"author\" itemscope itemtype=\"http:\/\/schema.org\/Person\">\n          <a href=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/auteur\/franck-guyonnet-duperat\/\" class=\"category-color\" itemprop=\"url\">\n            <span itemprop=\"name\" class=\"name\">\n              Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat            <\/span>\n            <img data-del=\"avatar\" alt=\"Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat\" src='https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/PORTRAIT-FRANCK-GUYONNET-DUPERAT-150x150.jpg' class='avatar pp-user-avatar avatar-150 photo ' height='150' width='150'\/>          <\/a>\n        <\/li>\n    \t    <\/ul>\n  <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"container\">\n  <div class=\"photo-une\" itemprop=\"image\" itemscope itemtype=\"http:\/\/schema.org\/ImageObject\">\n    <figure>\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CHINE-PEKIN.jpg\" class=\"article-image\" title=\"Le quartier d\u2019affaires autour de la tour CCTV \u00e0 P\u00e9kin, le 5 janvier 2015. (Cr\u00e9dit : Tian zhe \/ Imaginechina \/ via AFP).\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"697\" src=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CHINE-PEKIN.jpg\" class=\"img-responsive\" alt=\"Le quartier d\u2019affaires autour de la tour CCTV \u00e0 P\u00e9kin, le 5 janvier 2015.\" srcset=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CHINE-PEKIN.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CHINE-PEKIN-300x204.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a>\n      <meta itemprop=\"height\" content=\"1024\"\/>\n      <meta itemprop=\"width\" content=\"697\"\/>\n      <meta itemprop=\"contentUrl\" content=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/\"\/>\n      <figcaption class=\"legend\" itemprop=\"description\">\n      \t<div class=\"container\">\n        \tLe quartier d\u2019affaires autour de la tour CCTV \u00e0 P\u00e9kin, le 5 janvier 2015. (Cr\u00e9dit : Tian zhe \/ Imaginechina \/ via AFP).        <\/div>\n      <\/figcaption>\n    <\/figure>\n  <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"chapo\" itemprop=\"description\">\n\t\t<strong>Pour les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s \u00e9trang\u00e8res qui op\u00e8rent en Chine, lorsqu\u2019un conflit surgit avec un partenaire local, un client ou un fournisseur, se pose alors la question essentielle de l&rsquo;impartialit\u00e9 de la justice chinoise. Il s\u2019agit alors de savoir d\u00e9signer un \u201cbon\u201d tribunal arbitral, c\u2019est-\u00e0-dire celui dont les sentences seront ensuite rendues ex\u00e9cutoires par les cours populaires chinoises du lieu o\u00f9 l\u2019on veut ex\u00e9cuter la sentence &#8211; et o\u00f9 sont la plupart du temps situ\u00e9s les actifs de la partie perdante.<\/strong>\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tLa <em>China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission<\/em> (\u00ab\u00a0CIETAC\u00a0\u00bb) est la premi\u00e8re institution d\u2019arbitrage \u00e0 avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 cr\u00e9\u00e9e en Chine. En 2012, cette institution \u00e9tait la plus importante au monde en termes de nombre d\u2019affaires. Elle si\u00e8ge \u00e0 P\u00e9kin et poss\u00e8de 5 \u00ab\u00a0sous-commissions\u00a0\u00bb bas\u00e9es \u00e0 Chongqing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Tianjin et depuis peu Hong Kong.\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\t<div class=\"bulle\">\n\t*Notons qu\u2019une nouvelle r\u00e9vision de son r\u00e8glement d\u2019arbitrage est entr\u00e9e en vigueur le 1er janvier 2015.<\/div>En mars 2012, la CIETAC a annonc\u00e9 une r\u00e9vision de son r\u00e8glement d\u2019arbitrage, pr\u00e9vue pour entrer en vigueur le 1er mai 2012, avec l\u2019objectif affich\u00e9 de rapprocher ses r\u00e8gles de proc\u00e9dure de celles des grandes institutions d\u2019arbitrage internationales*.\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\t<div class=\"bulle\">\n\t*Le juge d\u2019 \u00ab\u00a0appui\u00a0\u00bb est le juge comp\u00e9tent pour r\u00e9gler tout diff\u00e9rend li\u00e9 \u00e0 la constitution du tribunal arbitral ; le juge de \u00ab\u00a0l\u2019annulation\u00a0\u00bb est le juge comp\u00e9tent pour conna\u00eetre du contentieux relatif \u00e0 l\u2019annulation des sentences arbitrales.<\/div>Par exemple, il est d\u00e9sormais possible de choisir que le si\u00e8ge de l\u2019arbitrage, c\u2019est-\u00e0-dire le lieu o\u00f9 se d\u00e9roulent les audiences, ne soit pas situ\u00e9 en Chine. Cela a pour cons\u00e9quence de donner comp\u00e9tence \u00e0 des juges d\u2019 <em>\u00ab\u00a0appui\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> ainsi qu\u2019\u00e0 des juges de l\u2019 <em>\u00ab\u00a0annulation\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>* en dehors des cours populaires chinoises.\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<h2><strong>La \u00ab\u00a0scission\u00a0\u00bb de Shanghai et Shenzhen<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tSuite \u00e0 cette annonce, les sous-commissions de Shanghai (<em>\u00ab\u00a0CIETAC Shanghai\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>) et de Shenzhen (<em>\u00ab\u00a0CIETAC South China\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>) ont fait publiquement part de leur opposition \u00e0 l\u2019entr\u00e9e en vigueur du nouveau r\u00e8glement. En r\u00e9action, le 1er ao\u00fbt 2012, la CIETAC a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 suspendre leurs autorisations \u00e0 se d\u00e9clarer comp\u00e9tentes pour administrer les litiges.\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tEn r\u00e9alit\u00e9, cette opposition s\u2019explique par l\u2019introduction dans le nouveau r\u00e8glement, d\u2019une r\u00e8gle pr\u00e9voyant que tous les litiges soumis \u00e0 la CIETAC soient d\u00e9sormais administr\u00e9s depuis P\u00e9kin, sauf clause d\u00e9signant express\u00e9ment l\u2019une de ses sous-commissions.\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tCela a introduit une rupture par rapport \u00e0 la pratique qui voulait jusqu\u2019alors que lorsque qu\u2019aucune pr\u00e9cision n\u2019\u00e9tait apport\u00e9e sur la sous-commission devant administrer le litige, il \u00e9tait tenu compte des facteurs g\u00e9ographiques du litige, du co\u00fbt de la proc\u00e9dure ou de la volont\u00e9 des parties.\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tOr, dans la mesure o\u00f9 la plupart des clauses d\u2019arbitrage d\u00e9signaient la CIETAC sans plus de pr\u00e9cisions et craignant une baisse de leurs revenus, les anciennes sous-commissions de Shanghai et de Shenzhen ont affirm\u00e9 qu\u2019elles continueraient \u00e0 se d\u00e9clarer comp\u00e9tentes pour administrer les litiges. Elles ont en effet affirm\u00e9 ne pas tenir leur comp\u00e9tence de la CIETAC, car \u00e0 la diff\u00e9rence des autres sous-commissions, elles s\u2019\u00e9taient constitu\u00e9es de mani\u00e8re ind\u00e9pendante, en dehors de la CIETAC, qu\u2019elles n\u2019avaient rejointe qu\u2019ensuite.\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tElles ont chacune adopt\u00e9 de nouveaux r\u00e8glements d\u2019arbitrage, d\u00e9sign\u00e9 de nouveaux panels d\u2019arbitres et modifi\u00e9 leurs noms :\n<ul>\n<li>depuis le mois d\u2019octobre 2012, la sous-commission de Shenzhen s\u2019appelle d\u00e9sormais la <em>\u00ab\u00a0Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> (\u00ab\u00a0SCIA\u00a0\u00bb) ou la <em>\u00ab\u00a0South China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> (\u00ab\u00a0SCIETAC\u00a0\u00bb);<\/li>\n<\/ul><ul><\/ul>\n<li>depuis le mois d\u2019avril 2013, la sous-commission de Shanghai s\u2019appelle le <em>\u00ab\u00a0Shanghai International Arbitration Center\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> (\u00ab\u00a0SHIAC\u00a0\u00bb) ou la <em>\u00ab\u00a0Shanghai International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> (\u00ab\u00a0SIETAC\u00a0\u00bb).<\/li>\n\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tDe plus, la SCIA et le SHIAC ont d\u00e9clar\u00e9 qu\u2019elles se reconna\u00eetraient comp\u00e9tentes pour les litiges dans lesquels la clause d\u2019arbitrage d\u00e9signerait respectivement la CIETAC de Shenzhen ou la CIETAC de Shanghai. De son c\u00f4t\u00e9, la CIETAC a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 qu\u2019elle se reconna\u00eetrait comp\u00e9tente dans les m\u00eames situations.\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<h2><strong>Les cours populaires se divisent<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tLa question s\u2019est alors pos\u00e9e de savoir si les cours populaires chinoises, face \u00e0 des sentences arbitrales rendues par la CIETAC ou par le SHIAC (et la SCIA), accepteraient d\u2019accorder l\u2019exequatur, c\u2019est-\u00e0-dire de donner force ex\u00e9cutoire \u00e0 leurs sentences? En d\u2019autres termes, reconna\u00eetraient-elles comme valable la comp\u00e9tence de la CIETAC ou du SHIAC (et de la SCIA) ?\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tLa Cour populaire Supr\u00eame est venue apporter une premi\u00e8re r\u00e9ponse le 4 septembre 2013 dans un avis intitul\u00e9 <em>\u00ab\u00a0Note concernant certaines questions pour le traitement judiciaire des dossiers d\u2019arbitrage\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> par lequel elle introduit la r\u00e8gle du <em>\u00ab\u00a0level by level reporting system\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>.\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tCet avis a \u00e9t\u00e9 rendu dans un contexte o\u00f9 en mai 2013 la Cour populaire interm\u00e9diaire de Suzhou (province du Jiangsu) ainsi que la Cour populaire interm\u00e9diaire de Ningbo (province du Zhejiang) ont rendu des jugements dans lesquels elles refusent d\u2019accorder l\u2019exequatur \u00e0 des sentences arbitrales rendues par la CIETAC de Shanghai.\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tLa motivation des deux cours est que la CIETAC de Shanghai (devenue par la suite le SHIAC), n\u2019a pas inform\u00e9 les parties du changement de son statut et n\u2019a pas donn\u00e9 aux parties la possibilit\u00e9 de confirmer leur choix ou au contraire, de le modifier et de d\u00e9signer une autre institution d\u2019arbitrage.\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tLe probl\u00e8me s\u2019est alors pos\u00e9 de savoir s\u2019il fallait modifier toutes les clauses d\u2019arbitrage dans les contrats en cours d\u2019ex\u00e9cution afin de pr\u00e9ciser si l\u2019on devait d\u00e9signer la CIETAC ou le SHIAC (et la SCIA). Par la suite, la Cour populaire sup\u00e9rieure de la Province du Zhejiang a en juillet 2013, infirm\u00e9 le jugement de la Cour populaire de Ningbo et l\u2019a enjoint \u00e0 rendre la sentence ex\u00e9cutoire. La Cour populaire sup\u00e9rieure du Jiangsu a pris la m\u00eame d\u00e9cision.\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<h2><strong>La Cour supr\u00eame tranche<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\t<div class=\"bulle\">\n\t*<em>\u00ab\u00a0R\u00e9ponse de la Cour Populaire Supr\u00eame sur la demande d\u2019instruction de la Haute Cour Populaire de Shanghai et Autres sur les questions relatives aux d\u00e9cisions de r\u00e9visions judiciaires des sentences arbitrales rendues par la CIETAC et ses anciennes sous-commissions\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>, Fa Shi [2015] No. 15 du 15 juillet 2015 ; entr\u00e9e en vigueur le 17 juillet 2015. <\/div>Suite au nombre croissant des demandes de r\u00e9visions judiciaires de l\u2019arbitrage et m\u00fb par le principe du respect de la volont\u00e9 des parties, la Cour Supr\u00eame a rendu une d\u00e9cision*, (ci-apr\u00e8s la <strong>\u00ab\u00a0D\u00e9cision\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong>) le 15 juillet 2015 suite \u00e0 une demande d\u2019instruction de la Cour populaire sup\u00e9rieure de Shanghai sur la question de la r\u00e9vision judiciaire des sentences arbitrales rendues par la CIETAC et ses anciennes sous-commissions. \t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tLa Cour Supr\u00eame vient d\u00e9sormais de mettre fin aux incertitudes concernant la comp\u00e9tence de telle ou telle institution d\u2019arbitrage et soumet leur comp\u00e9tence \u00e0 trois situations chronologiques diff\u00e9rentes :\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\t\n<ul>\n<li>si les parties ont d\u00e9sign\u00e9, avant la scission des sous-commissions de Shanghai et de Shenzhen, la <em>\u00ab\u00a0CIETAC South-China Sub-commission\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> ou \u00e0 la  <em>\u00ab\u00a0CIETAC Shanghai Sub-commission\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>, la SCIA ou le SHIAC seront comp\u00e9tentes pour conna\u00eetre du litige ;\n<\/li>\n<\/ul><ul><\/ul>\n<li>si les parties, apr\u00e8s la scission mais avant l\u2019entr\u00e9e en vigueur de la D\u00e9cision, ont d\u00e9sign\u00e9 la <em>\u00ab\u00a0CIETAC South-China Sub-commission\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> ou \u00e0 la  <em>\u00ab\u00a0CIETAC Shanghai Sub-commission\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>, la CIETAC sera comp\u00e9tente pour conna\u00eetre de l\u2019affaire.<\/li>\n<ul>\n<li>Cependant, si l\u2019une des parties soumet le conflit \u00e0 la SCIA ou au SHIAC et que l\u2019autre partie ne soul\u00e8ve aucune objection sur la comp\u00e9tence de la SCIA ou du SHIAC, une fois la sentence arbitrale rendue, la partie concern\u00e9e ne pourra demander la r\u00e9vocation ou la non-ex\u00e9cution de celle-ci au motif que la SCIA ou du SHIAC ne sont pas comp\u00e9tentes ;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<li>si les parties, apr\u00e8s la date d\u2019entr\u00e9e en vigueur de la D\u00e9cision, soumettent leur conflit \u00e0 la <em>\u00ab\u00a0CIETAC South-China Sub-commission\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> ou \u00e0 la <em>\u00ab\u00a0CIETAC Shanghai Sub-commission\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>, la CIETAC sera comp\u00e9tente pour conna\u00eetre de l\u2019affaire.<\/li>\n\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tCette d\u00e9cision qui clarifie la question de la comp\u00e9tence des institutions d\u2019arbitrage en Chine, a \u00e9t\u00e9 particuli\u00e8rement bien accueillie par la SCIA et le SHIAC.\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n\t\tLes parties doivent en revanche, \u00eatre tr\u00e8s pr\u00e9cises dans la r\u00e9daction de leurs conventions d\u2019arbitrage afin qu\u2019aucune ambigu\u00eft\u00e9 ne persiste sur le choix de l\u2019institution d\u2019arbitrage, et cela est renforc\u00e9 par le fait que la CIETAC a annonc\u00e9 le 31 d\u00e9cembre 2014, avoir ouvert une nouvelle sous-commission \u00e0 Shanghai ainsi qu\u2019une nouvelle sous-commission \u00e0 Shenzhen.\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"text\" style=\"background:#d9463d; padding:20px 20px 30px 20px; text-align:center; border-radius:8px;\">\n\t\t<h3 style=\"color:#fff; font-weight:700;\">Soutenez-nous !<\/h3>\n\t\t<p style=\"color:#fff; font-size:0.8em; line-height:1.5em; margin-bottom:30px;\">Asialyst est con\u00e7u par une \u00e9quipe compos\u00e9e \u00e0 100 % de b\u00e9n\u00e9voles et gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 un r\u00e9seau de contributeurs en Asie ou ailleurs, journalistes, experts, universitaires, consultants ou anciens diplomates... Notre seul but : partager la connaissance de l'Asie au plus large public.<\/p>\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.helloasso.com\/associations\/les-amis-d-asialyst\/formulaires\/1\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"display:inline; background:#fff; padding:10px 25px; font-weight:700; border-radius:4px; color:#000; font-size:0.9em;\">Faire un don<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"tags\">\n\t\t<h5>Tags de l'article<\/h5>\n\t\t<ul><li><a href=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/tag\/asie-du-nord-est\/\" rel=\"tag\">Asie du Nord-Est<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/tag\/chine\/\" rel=\"tag\">Chine<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/tag\/droit-des-affaires\/\" rel=\"tag\">droit des affaires<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/tag\/regards\/\" rel=\"tag\">Regards<\/a><\/li><\/ul><ul>\t<\/ul><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t<div class=\"social-sharing ss-social-sharing\">\r\n\t\t\t\t        <a onclick=\"return ss_plugin_loadpopup_js(this);\" rel=\"external nofollow\" class=\"ss-button-facebook\" href=\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fasialyst.com%2Ffr%2F2015%2F12%2F07%2Farbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications%2F\" target=\"_blank\">Share on Facebook<\/a><a onclick=\"return ss_plugin_loadpopup_js(this);\" rel=\"external nofollow\" class=\"ss-button-twitter\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet\/?text=Arbitrage+en+Chine+%3A+imbroglio+et+clarifications&url=https%3A%2F%2Fasialyst.com%2Ffr%2F2015%2F12%2F07%2Farbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications%2F&via=asialyst\" target=\"_blank\">Share on Twitter<\/a><a onclick=\"return ss_plugin_loadpopup_js(this);\" rel=\"external nofollow\" class=\"ss-button-linkedin\" href=\"http:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https%3A%2F%2Fasialyst.com%2Ffr%2F2015%2F12%2F07%2Farbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications%2F&title=Arbitrage+en+Chine+%3A+imbroglio+et+clarifications\" target=\"_blank\">Share on Linkedin<\/a><a onclick=\"return ss_plugin_loadpopup_js(this);\" rel=\"external nofollow\" class=\"ss-button-pinterest\" href=\"http:\/\/pinterest.com\/pin\/create\/button\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fasialyst.com%2Ffr%2F2015%2F12%2F07%2Farbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications%2F&media=https%3A%2F%2Fasialyst.com%2Ffr%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F12%2FCHINE-PEKIN-300x204.jpg&description=Arbitrage+en+Chine+%3A+imbroglio+et+clarifications\" target=\"_blank\">Share on Pinterest<\/a>\t        \t    <\/div>\r\n\t    \n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"auteurs-a-propos\">\n\t\t<h5>A propos de l'auteur<\/h5>\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"author\">\n\t\t\t\t<img data-del=\"avatar\" src='https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/PORTRAIT-FRANCK-GUYONNET-DUPERAT-150x150.jpg' class='avatar pp-user-avatar avatar-150wp-user-avatar wp-user-avatar-150 photo ' height='150' width='150'\/>\t\t\t\t<div class=\"infos\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"name\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/auteur\/franck-guyonnet-duperat\/\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFranck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"description\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\tAvocat au barreau de Paris, Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat exerce le droit des proc\u00e9dures collectives \/ restructuration d'entreprises au sein du cabinet Aston \u00e0 Paris. Il a travaill\u00e9 pr\u00e9c\u00e9demment pendant pr\u00e8s de trois ans au sein des antennes de Shanghai et de Singapour du cabinet DS Avocats, dans l\u2019aide \u00e0 l\u2019implantation, \u00e0 la structuration et \u00e0 la restructuration des investissements des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s fran\u00e7aises et europ\u00e9ennes en Asie (droit des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s, droit du travail, droit de la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle, r\u00e9daction de contrats commerciaux).\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n[asl-front-abonnez-vous]\n<div class=\"block3news\">\n\t<div class=\"container\">\n\t\t<div class=\"recommand\">\n\t\t\t<h5>On vous recommande<\/h5>\t\t\t<ul class=\"row\">\n\t\t\t\t<li class=\"col-md-6 col-sm-12 col-xs-12 news\"><a href=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/11\/26\/la-chine-et-ses-hybrides-culturels\/\"><span class=\"photo\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" src=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/CHINE-JEUNE-DIPLOMEE-600x400.jpg\" class=\"img-responsive wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/CHINE-JEUNE-DIPLOMEE-600x400.jpg 600w, https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/CHINE-JEUNE-DIPLOMEE-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/span><span class=\"info\"><span class=\"metadata category category-\">Soci\u00e9t\u00e9<\/span><h4>La Chine et ses \"hybrides culturels\"<\/h4><\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"col-md-6 col-sm-12 col-xs-12 news\"><a href=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/11\/26\/digital-et-copyright-en-chine-on-en-est-ou\/\"><span class=\"photo\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" src=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/CHINE-BAIDU-MUSIQUE-COPYRIGHT-600x400.jpg\" class=\"img-responsive wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/CHINE-BAIDU-MUSIQUE-COPYRIGHT-600x400.jpg 600w, https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/CHINE-BAIDU-MUSIQUE-COPYRIGHT-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/CHINE-BAIDU-MUSIQUE-COPYRIGHT.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/CHINE-BAIDU-MUSIQUE-COPYRIGHT-900x600.jpg 900w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/span><span class=\"info\"><span class=\"metadata category category-\">Culture<\/span><h4>Digital et copyright en Chine, on en est o\u00f9 ?<\/h4><\/span><\/a><\/li>\t\t\t<\/ul>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"container\">\n\t<div class=\"comments\">\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Notre chronique juridique d\u00e9bute sur les institutions d\u2019arbitrage en Chine : qui est comp\u00e9tent ? La Cour Supr\u00eame a tranch\u00e9.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":237,"featured_media":7413,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[23,22,539,194],"class_list":["post-7409","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economie","tag-asie-du-nord-est","tag-chine","tag-droit-des-affaires","tag-regards"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Arbitrage en Chine : imbroglio et clarifications - Asialyst<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Notre chronique juridique d\u00e9bute sur les institutions d\u2019arbitrage en Chine : qui est comp\u00e9tent ? La Cour Supr\u00eame a tranch\u00e9.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Arbitrage en Chine : imbroglio et clarifications - Asialyst\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Notre chronique juridique d\u00e9bute sur les institutions d\u2019arbitrage en Chine : qui est comp\u00e9tent ? La Cour Supr\u00eame a tranch\u00e9.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Asialyst\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Asialyst.fr\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-12-07T12:25:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-10T14:37:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CHINE-PEKIN.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"697\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/07\\\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/07\\\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/684703d17375e008959ab52b337eb57f\"},\"headline\":\"Arbitrage en Chine : imbroglio et clarifications\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-12-07T12:25:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-10T14:37:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/07\\\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1590,\"commentCount\":1,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/07\\\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/CHINE-PEKIN.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Asie du Nord-Est\",\"Chine\",\"droit des affaires\",\"Regards\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Economie\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/07\\\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/07\\\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/07\\\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\\\/\",\"name\":\"Arbitrage en Chine : imbroglio et clarifications - Asialyst\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/07\\\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/07\\\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/CHINE-PEKIN.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-12-07T12:25:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-10T14:37:38+00:00\",\"description\":\"Notre chronique juridique d\u00e9bute sur les institutions d\u2019arbitrage en Chine : qui est comp\u00e9tent ? La Cour Supr\u00eame a tranch\u00e9.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/07\\\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/07\\\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/07\\\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/CHINE-PEKIN.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/CHINE-PEKIN.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":697,\"caption\":\"Le quartier d\u2019affaires autour de la tour CCTV \u00e0 P\u00e9kin, le 5 janvier 2015. (Cr\u00e9dit : Tian zhe \\\/ Imaginechina \\\/ via AFP).\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/07\\\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Arbitrage en Chine : imbroglio et clarifications\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Asialyst\",\"description\":\"Votre m\u00e9dia sur l Asie\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Asialyst\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/logo_blanc.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/logo_blanc.png\",\"width\":657,\"height\":165,\"caption\":\"Asialyst\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/Asialyst.fr\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/684703d17375e008959ab52b337eb57f\",\"name\":\"Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/PORTRAIT-FRANCK-GUYONNET-DUPERAT-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/PORTRAIT-FRANCK-GUYONNET-DUPERAT-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/PORTRAIT-FRANCK-GUYONNET-DUPERAT-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat\"},\"description\":\"Avocat au barreau de Paris, Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat exerce le droit des proc\u00e9dures collectives \\\/ restructuration d'entreprises au sein du cabinet Aston \u00e0 Paris. Il a travaill\u00e9 pr\u00e9c\u00e9demment pendant pr\u00e8s de trois ans au sein des antennes de Shanghai et de Singapour du cabinet DS Avocats, dans l\u2019aide \u00e0 l\u2019implantation, \u00e0 la structuration et \u00e0 la restructuration des investissements des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s fran\u00e7aises et europ\u00e9ennes en Asie (droit des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s, droit du travail, droit de la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle, r\u00e9daction de contrats commerciaux).\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.ds-asie.com\\\/GUYONNET-DUPERAT-Franck\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/asialyst.com\\\/fr\\\/auteur\\\/franck-guyonnet-duperat\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Arbitrage en Chine : imbroglio et clarifications - Asialyst","description":"Notre chronique juridique d\u00e9bute sur les institutions d\u2019arbitrage en Chine : qui est comp\u00e9tent ? La Cour Supr\u00eame a tranch\u00e9.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Arbitrage en Chine : imbroglio et clarifications - Asialyst","og_description":"Notre chronique juridique d\u00e9bute sur les institutions d\u2019arbitrage en Chine : qui est comp\u00e9tent ? La Cour Supr\u00eame a tranch\u00e9.","og_url":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/","og_site_name":"Asialyst","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Asialyst.fr","article_published_time":"2015-12-07T12:25:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-10T14:37:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":697,"url":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CHINE-PEKIN.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat","Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/"},"author":{"name":"Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat","@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/684703d17375e008959ab52b337eb57f"},"headline":"Arbitrage en Chine : imbroglio et clarifications","datePublished":"2015-12-07T12:25:16+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-10T14:37:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/"},"wordCount":1590,"commentCount":1,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CHINE-PEKIN.jpg","keywords":["Asie du Nord-Est","Chine","droit des affaires","Regards"],"articleSection":["Economie"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/","url":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/","name":"Arbitrage en Chine : imbroglio et clarifications - Asialyst","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CHINE-PEKIN.jpg","datePublished":"2015-12-07T12:25:16+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-10T14:37:38+00:00","description":"Notre chronique juridique d\u00e9bute sur les institutions d\u2019arbitrage en Chine : qui est comp\u00e9tent ? La Cour Supr\u00eame a tranch\u00e9.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CHINE-PEKIN.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CHINE-PEKIN.jpg","width":1024,"height":697,"caption":"Le quartier d\u2019affaires autour de la tour CCTV \u00e0 P\u00e9kin, le 5 janvier 2015. (Cr\u00e9dit : Tian zhe \/ Imaginechina \/ via AFP)."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/2015\/12\/07\/arbitrage-en-chine-imbroglio-et-clarifications\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Arbitrage en Chine : imbroglio et clarifications"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/","name":"Asialyst","description":"Votre m\u00e9dia sur l Asie","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/#organization","name":"Asialyst","url":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/logo_blanc.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/logo_blanc.png","width":657,"height":165,"caption":"Asialyst"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Asialyst.fr"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/684703d17375e008959ab52b337eb57f","name":"Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/PORTRAIT-FRANCK-GUYONNET-DUPERAT-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/PORTRAIT-FRANCK-GUYONNET-DUPERAT-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/PORTRAIT-FRANCK-GUYONNET-DUPERAT-150x150.jpg","caption":"Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat"},"description":"Avocat au barreau de Paris, Franck Guyonnet-Dup\u00e9rat exerce le droit des proc\u00e9dures collectives \/ restructuration d'entreprises au sein du cabinet Aston \u00e0 Paris. Il a travaill\u00e9 pr\u00e9c\u00e9demment pendant pr\u00e8s de trois ans au sein des antennes de Shanghai et de Singapour du cabinet DS Avocats, dans l\u2019aide \u00e0 l\u2019implantation, \u00e0 la structuration et \u00e0 la restructuration des investissements des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s fran\u00e7aises et europ\u00e9ennes en Asie (droit des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s, droit du travail, droit de la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle, r\u00e9daction de contrats commerciaux).","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.ds-asie.com\/GUYONNET-DUPERAT-Franck"],"url":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/auteur\/franck-guyonnet-duperat\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7409","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/237"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7409"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7409\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7440,"href":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7409\/revisions\/7440"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7413"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7409"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7409"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asialyst.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7409"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}